PENGARUH KEBIJAKAN TARIFF IMPOR GULA TERHADAP PERMINTAAN GULA INDONESIA

Authors

  • Muhammad Emil Rahman Jurusan Administrasi Niaga, Universitas Tulang Bawang Lampung
  • Fajar Mutia Suri Jurusan Administrasi Niaga, Universitas Tulang Bawang Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37090/jpb.v2i1.372

Abstract

ABSTRAK
Industri gula Indonesia masih tetap dihadapi dengan permasalahan dalam mencapai kemandirian pangan dimana untuk memenuhi pasokan konsumsi baik untuk rumah tangga dan industri selalu berbanding terbalik dengan produksinya. Keiikutsertaan Indonesia dalam berbagai perjanjian dan kesepakatan perdagangan seharusnya menjadikan peluang yang dimulai dari komitmen pada GATT dalam kesepakatan WTO dan CEPT pada kesepakatan AFTA dimana pada kesepakatan tersebut bertujuan untuk menciptakan pasar yang adil dan transparan khususnya untuk usaha pertanian sehingga menciptakan industri pertanian yang mandiri tanpa bantuan atau intervensi didalammnya. Pada tahun 2004 berbagai negara berkembang termasuk Indonesia memulai pelaksanaan konteks dalam perjanjian tersebut, pada kenyataannya muncul berbagai intervensi yang lebih mementingkan kepentingan domestik. Komoditas gula yang memiliki karakteristik tersendiri dibandingkan dengan komoditas lainnya, intervensi yang semakin ketat, perubahan harga yang berfluktuasi, dan kondisi produksi yang semakin bersaing dengan komoditas substitusinya menjadikan pasar gula Indonesia semakin sulit untuk mengembangkan dan mempertahankan stabilitas perekonomiannya
Kata Kunci: Kebijakan Tariff, Impor, Gula, Permintaan.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abidin Z. 2000. Dampak Liberalisasi Perdagangan terhadap Keragaman Industri Gula Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Kebijakan [disertasi]. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor.

[AGFAE] Asociacion General de Fabricaantes de Azucar de Espana. 1992. El Azucar en LaEspana Contemporanea. hal, 57. Madrid, (ESP)

Alas M. 1996. The Impact of Trade Liberalization by Major Importing and Exporting Countries on World Sugar Trade [disertasi]. University of Colorado (US)

Alvarez J, Polopolus LC. 2008. Sugar and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, (US)

Aradhey A. 2016. India : Sugar Annual Report 2016, USDA/GAIN (US)

Arifin B. 2008. Indonesian Sugar Self-Sufficency, Economic Review¸No. 211, Jakarta

Ball R J. 1973. The International Linkage of National Economics Models. North-Holland Publisihng Company, Amesterdam, (NLD)

Balistreri E,. Jensen J, Tarr D. 2015. What Determines Wheater Prefential Liberalization of Barriers againts Foreign Investors in Services Are Beneficial or Immizerising: Application of the Case of Kenya, Vol.9,2015-42

Barros S. 2016. Brazil : Sugar Annual Report 2016, USDA/GAIN

Benirschka M, Koo W W, Lou J. 1996. World Sugar Policy Simulation Model Description and Computer Program Documentation, Agriculture Economics Report No. 356, Departement of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State, (US)

Block CD. 2009. Corporate Taxation Examples & Explanations, Ed ke – 4, Aspen publishers, (US)

Breguet P. 2012. Impact of Australian Sugar Policy on the World Sugar Economy. FAO 12thSugar Conferene. Fiji, (JPN)

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statitstik. 2015. Statistik Tebu Indonesia, Jakarta

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statitstik. 2016. Statistik Perdagangan Luar Negeri-Impor, Jakarta

[CEPT-AFTA] The Common Effevtive Preferential Tariff scheme for the ASEAN Free Trade Area. 1992. Singapura

Chatenay PH. 2013. Government Support and the Brazilian Sugar Industry. a report for American Sugar Alliance (UK)

Dardis R, Warner E. 1967. Measures of the Degree and Cost of Economic Protection of Agriculture in Selected Countries : Issue 1384, USDA, Economic Research Services

Data dan Fakta Gula. 2012. Berbagai Istilah terkait Gula

Departemen Perindustrian. 2009. Roadmap Industri Gula, Direktorat Jendral Industri Agro dan Kimia, Jakarta

Dirjen Perkebunan. 2014. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia 2013-2015, Jakarta

Diewert WE, Morrison CJ. 1986.Export Supply and Import Demand Functions : A Production Theory Approach, National Beureu of Economic Research, Cambridge (US)

[EC] European Commision. 2012. Statistical and Economic Information Report 2012, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

Enders W. 2004. Applied Econometric Time Series. Ed ke-2. Wiley. Alabama (US)

Fairtrade Foundation. 2013. Fairtrade and Sugar, Commodity Briefing

Farrell R. 2015. Australia : Sugar Annual 2015, GAIN report no: AS1508, USDA (US)

[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 1997. Impact of Trade Liberalization on the World Sugar Market. Economic and Social Develompment Departement. Pasific sugar conference, Fiji (JPN)

Flach B et. al. 2016. EU-28 Biofuels Annual 2016, GAIN report no : NL6021, USDA (US)

Funk SM, Zook JE, Featherstone AM. 2008. Chicago Board of Trade Ethanol Contract Efficency. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Dallas (US)

Galloway J H. 2000.Sugar The Cambridge World History of Food, Cambridge University Pr (UK)

Gujarati D. 2004. Basic Econometrics. Ed ke – 4. McGraw Hill Inc, New York (US)

Goldin I, Knudsen O. 1990.Agricultural Trade Liberaliation : Implication for Developing Countries. ): OECD.Paris (FRA)

Gonarsyah I. 1983. An Econometric Analysis of the U.S- Japan –Korea Market for U.S White Wheat, Departement of Agriculture and Resource Economics, Oregon State University

Hill C, Griffiths W, Judge G. 1997. Undergraduate Econometric. John Wiley & Son, Inc. Canada (US)

Hubbard M. 2003. Developing Agricultural Trade New Roles for Government in Poor Countries. Palgrave Macmillan (UK)

Houck JP. 1986. Elements of Agicultural Trade Policies. Macmillan Publisihng Company, A Division of Macmillan, Canada (US)

[ICUMSA] International Commission for Uniform Methods of Sugar Analysis. 2009. Polarimetry and the International Sugar Scale. ISCUMSA Method SPS-1. Berlin (DEU)

[IMF] International Monetary Fund.2009.Export and Import, Price, Index, Manual Theory and Practice, IMF Multimedia Services Section (US)

[ISJ] International Sugar Journal. 2015. ISJ’s World Sugar Outlook 2015. De Smet. Informa. (UK)

Johnson GL. 1986. Research Methodology for Economists, Philosophy and Practice. Macmillan Publisihng Company, A Division of Macmillan. New York, (US)

Kementrian Pertanian.2016. Outlook Tebu Komoditas Pertanian Subsektor Perkebunan, Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian Sekertariat Jendral, ISSN 1907-1507, 2016, Jakarta

Koutsoyiannis A. 1977. Theory of Economoetrics. Ed ke – 2. Macmillan Publisihng Company, A Division of Macmillan, London (UK)

Krishnan B, Bousso R. 2016. Oil up 7 percent as Iran welcomes output freeze without word on cuts, Reuters, Commodities, 17 Februari 2016

Krugman PR, Obstfeld M. 2003.International Economics Theory and Policy, World Student Series, Ed ke – 6. The Addison-Wesley. Boston (US)

[KPPU] Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. 2014. Laporan Tahunan KPPU 2014. Biro hukum, Humas dan KPPU, Jakarta

[LIFE] London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange. 2016. London Daily Price, contract no. 407, (EU)

Macedo IC. 2007. Sugar cane’s Energy, Twelve studies on Brazilian Sugar cane agribusiness and its sustainability. UNICA, Sao Paulo (BRZ)

Mairon G, Lima B. 2012.

Malian A H. 2004. Kebijakan Perdagangan International Komoditas Pertanian Indonesia, PSEKP, AKP. Vol 2 No. 2, Juni 2004, Bogor

Messrs, Akiyama T, Corbin M. 1997. The Japanese Sugar Market.FAO Corporate document repositry. Fiji (JPN)

Mitchell D O. 2005. Sugar Policies: An Opportunity for Change. Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries. Chapter. 8. GAT (US)

Nainggolan K. 2000. Constraints and Consequences of Trade Liberalization on Agriculture in Indonesia. Paper presented at the Seminar on Policy Analysis of Linkages between Indonesia’s Agricultural production, 12 Juni 2000, Jakarta

Neuman W L. 2003. Social Research Methods, Qualitiative and Quantitative Approaches. Ed ke – 5. Pearson Education Inc. Boston, (US)

Nyberg J. 2006. Sugar International Profile, FAO, (US)

OECD/FAO. 2007. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016. Sekjen OECD dan Dirjen FAO, (US)

[OPEC] Organization of Petrolieum Exporting Countries. 2016. Annual OPEC oil price from 1960 to 2016, The Statistics Portal

Outlaw JL, Richardson JW. 2016. Analysis of the Coalition for Sugar Reform Amandements to U.S Sugar Policy : Potential Effect on Policy and Industry, American Sugar Alliance, Texas A&M University, 17 Mei 2016, (US)

Owiye PO, Naibei, IK, Momanyi G. 2016. Effect of Trade Liberalization of Performance of Sugar Firms in Kenya: The Case of Government Owned Firms, European Scientific Journal, vol 12, No. 13. doi : 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n13p306.

Phillips L. 2012. Overview & OutlookBrazillian Sugarcane Industry, UNICA, North America

Pindyck R S dan Rubinfield DL.1998. Econometric Model and Economic Forecast. Ed ke – 4, McGraw hill, New York (US)

Prasertsri P. 2016. Thailand : Sugar Annual Report 2016, report No. TH5047, USDA (US)

Porter C. 2016. World Agricultural Prospects The Road to 2050, Supply Intelligence Ltd

Rahman RY. 2013. Prospek Perdagangan Gula Indonesia dalam Implementasi Kerangka Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas ASEAN-China. [tesis]. Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor.

[RFA] Renewable Fuels Association. 2016. Fueling A High Octane Future, 2016 Ethanol Industry Outlook, tersedia pada : www.EthanolIRFA.org

Rezbova H, Belova A, Skubna O. 2013, Sugar Beet Production in the European Union and their Future Trends. Agris in Economics and Informatics, Faculty of Economics and Management,vol 5, No 4, Pregue, (CZE)

Samuelson PA, Nordhus WD. 2001. Economics. Ed ke – 17. McGraw hill. Virginia, (US)

Salvatore D, Hagen JV. 1997. Macroeconomic Policy in Open Economies. Greenwood Press. (US)

Sekjen Kementrian Pertanian. 2014. Outlook Komoditi Tebu, Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian, ISSN 1907-1507, Jakarta

Susila W R. 2005. Pengembangan Industri Gula Indonesia: Analisis Kebijakan dan Keterpaduan Sistem Produksi. [disertasi], Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor

Sitepu K R, Sinaga B M. 2006. Aplikasi Model Ekonometrika : Estimasi, Simulasi, Peramalan menggunakan program SAS, Program Studi Ilmu Ekonomi Pertanian, Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor

Tim Dampak AEC. 2016. Laporan Dampak ASEAN Economic Community terhadap Sektor Industri Sektor Industri dan Jasa serta Tenaga Kerja di Indonesia, No. Lap-10/KF.4/2014, Jakarta

Tweeten L. 1989. Agriculture Policy and Analysis Tools for Economic Development. Westview Press Inc, Boulder & San Francisco, (US)

[UNICA] Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association. 2017. UNICAData tersedia pada : http://www.unicadata.com.br/index.php

VanGreasstek C. 2013. The History and Future of the World Trade Organization. WTO, Atar Roto Press SA, Geneva (SWZ)

Valdes C, Hjort K, Seeley R. 2016. Oil Price and Ethanol Demand Drive Change in Agricultural Commodity Production in Brazil, Amber Waves, USDA, (US)

Wijaya A. 2000. Dampak Liberalisasi Perdagangan terhadap Kinerja Ekonomi Indonesia : Suatu Pendekatan Makroekonometrika. [disertasi], Bogor (ID) : Institut Pertanian Bogor

Wright T, Meylinah. 2016. Indonesian Sugar Annual Report 2016, GAIN report No. ID1614, 21 Maret 2016, USDA (US)

Wohlgenant M K. 1999. Effect of Trade Liberalization on the World Sugar Market, Sugar and Baverages Group, Raw Materials, Tropical and Horticultiral Products Service Commodities and Trade Division, FAO of United Nations, Rome (ITA)

Woo WW, Kennedy PL. 2005. International Trade and Agriculture. Blackwell. Victoria (AUS)

Downloads

Published

2018-06-01

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): Jurnal Perspective Business

Section

List of Articles in This Issue

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Muhammad Emil Rahman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.