KEDUDUKAN JAKSA AGUNG PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 49/PUU-VIII/2010 DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37090/keadilan.v17i2.266Abstract
This writing aims to determine the basis for the consideration of the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 49/PUU-VIII /2010 on Article 22 Paragraph (1) letter d of Law Number 16 Year 2004 in the legal state prespective and to know the legal consequences of legal actions by the Attorney General before and after The Constitutional Court's decision. Using normative juridical research methods with prescriptive analysis. The conclusion of this writing is that the decision making number 49/PUU-VIII /2010 is based on the provisions of laws and regulations relating to the Constitutional Court, witnesses and experts presented by the petitioner and the government. The legal consequences of the Attorney General's actions prior to the Constitutional Court decision regarding the issuance of policies that brought legal consequences to the applicant in decision Number 49/PUU-VIII/2010 were valid and after the Constitutional Court decision, the position of Attorney General Hendarman Supanji was declared invalid, but the verdict could still be made Rejudicial review if there are constitutional reasons as regulated in the Regulation of the Constitutional Court Number 6 of 2005 concerning Guidelines for Procedures in Judicial Review Cases.
Keywords : The Majestic Prosecutor Position, Decision Of The Constitusional Court, Legal State
References
Buku
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. Jakarta : Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2009.
Sudikmo Mertokusumo, Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1998.
Muhammad Tahir Azhary, Negara Hukum: Suatu studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya dilihat dari segi hukum Islam, Implementasinya pada Periode Negara Madinah dan Masa Kini. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2004.
Karya Ilmiah
B. Arief Sidharta, Kajian Kefilsafatan Tentang Negara Hukum, Jurnal Hukum Jentera, Edisi 3 tahun II November, 2014
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 06/PMK/2005 tentang Pedoman Beracara dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-VIII/2010 tentang Pengujian Terhadap Pasal 22 Ayat (1) huruf d Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Website
http://yancearizona.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/di-balik-konstitusionalitas-bersyarat-putusan-mk_files.pdf. diakses tanggal 1 Oktober 2020 pukul 15.20 WIB
