Keadilan 2022-10-15T05:01:17+00:00 Dr. Mieke Yustia Ayu Ratna Sari, S.H.M.H. Open Journal Systems <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Keadilan </strong>merupakan majalan ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tulang Bawang, telah ada sejak tahun 2006 dengan menerima 8 naskah hasil penelitian dan pemikiran kritis mengenai kajian bidang ilmu hukum setiap edisinya. Namun karena terdapat berbagai kendala mengalami ketidakaktifan selama beberapa tahun. Mulai tahun 2012 terbit kembali, namun dalam edisi cetak. Revitalisasi dilakukan agar dapat mempertahankan publikasi periodiknya, meningkatkan kualitas sebagai sumber referensi hukum yang memenuhi syarat, maka mulai edisi februari 2021 Keadilan Jurnal Penelitian dan Ilmu Hukum dipublikasikan secara online dapat diakses pada situs web. Edisi cetak diterbitkan pada akhir periode publikasi. Pada penerbitan edisi ini terdapat beberapa perubahan format penulisan, perubahan tim editor, serta perubahan jumlah naskah yang diterbitkan yaitu 5 naskah dalam setiap edisinya. Keadilan Jurnal Penelitian dan Ilmu Hukum adalah anggota Asosiasi Pengelola Jurnal Hukum Indonesia (APJHI).</p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Keadilan</strong> terbit dua kali dalam setahun yaitu pada bulan Februari dan Agustus. Setiap terbit menerima 5 naskah hasil penelitian dan pemikiran kritis mengenai kajian bidang ilmu hukum. Artikel yang diterbitkan merupakan opini dan argumentasi dari masing-masing penulis, bukan sebagai perwakilan dari tim editor maupun pendapat fakultas.</p> <p>p-ISSN: <a href=";1180426426&amp;1&amp;&amp;" target="_top" rel="noopener">1858-4314</a> | e-ISSN: <a href=";1520821435&amp;1&amp;&amp;" target="_top" rel="noopener">2623-1867</a></p> ASPEK KRIMINOLOGI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA MENGALIHKAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA TANPA PERSETUJUAN TERTULIS TERLEBIH DAHULU DARI PENERIMA FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI TANJUNGKARANG NOMOR : 740/PID.SUS/2020/PN.TJK 2022-10-15T04:45:59+00:00 Tami Rusli Yulia Hesti Heru Andrianto <p><em>A person in a consumer financing agreement with a fiduciary guarantee is prohibited from transferring the object of the fiduciary guarantee to another party without the consent of the fiduciary recipient. This study discusses the problem of what are the factors causing the perpetrator and how criminal responsibility for the perpetrator of a criminal act transfers the object of the fiduciary guarantee without prior written consent from the fiduciary recipient. This study uses a normative juridical approach and an empirical juridical approach. Collecting data by field studies and literature studies. Data analysis was carried out in a qualitative juridical manner, namely the analysis was carried out descriptively. Consumer finance companies should control, supervise and review the object of fiduciary security every month so that it can be seen whether the object of the fiduciary guarantee is in the control of the debtor, is not damaged and is not transferred to a third party, thereby reducing the losses that will be suffered by the creditor and is expected to be necessary. there is awareness of the public who enter into consumer financing agreements with fiduciary guarantees to pay more attention to their responsibilities in fulfilling achievements, because acts of breach of contract cannot always be resolved by deliberation. The imposition of imprisonment if it can provide a deterrent effect and become a motivation for good intentions.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords : </em></strong><strong><em>Criminal Liability, Criminal act, Fiduciary Guarantee</em></strong></p> 2022-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 55 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG KEKARANTINAAN KESEHATAN PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 (STUDI KASUS KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG) 2022-10-15T04:50:34+00:00 Sultan Ali Sabana Baharuddin Baharuddin Anggalana Anggalana <p><em>Health quarantine is an effort to prevent the impact of infectious disease outbreaks that can attack a place, region, even a country, by closing access in and out and limiting the activities or activities of people in the area that is implementing quarantine. For the sake of implementing a proper health quarantine, it is necessary to pay attention to and consider several factors, such as the economic condition of the community, health services, educational services, and working conditions. The implementation of health quarantine is the responsibility of the Government as a manifestation of the State to be able to fulfill all the factors that can support the implementation of health quarantine in an area without causing new problems in people's lives. The government enforces health quarantine with various patterns, such as the implementation of Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) to the Enforcement of Restrictions on Community Activities (PPKM). As a state of law, Indonesia certainly underlies the implementation of health quarantine by referring to the constitution of the State of Indonesia, namely Law number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of Article 55 of Law Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine in Bandar Lampung City and analyze the fulfillment of citizens' rights in the implementation of Community Activity Restrictions (PPKM) in Bandar Lampung City. The method used in this research is normative juridical and empirical juridical. The data that has been systematically arranged were analyzed qualitatively. In this data analysis process, a series of data that has been systematically arranged according to its classification, is then described and analyzed in a normative and empirical juridical manner, namely the approach taken based on the main legal material by examining theories, concepts, principles and laws and regulations related to this research as well as the results of interviewing parties related to the results of this study.</em></p> <p><em>&nbsp;</em><strong><em>Keywords : health quarantine</em></strong><strong><em>, Covid-19, PPKM, Government, Peopel</em></strong></p> 2022-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI ANAK OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM SUATU PUTUSAN PERCERAIAN 2022-10-15T04:55:45+00:00 Rai Mantili <p><em>Execution as a legal action taken by the court to the losing party in a case is a further rule and procedure of the case examination process. Execution or execution of a decision is an act carried out by force against the losing party in a case. Not all court decisions have executive power, not all court decisions can be executed. In a divorce case in the Religious Courts, if the judge has given a decision that one of the parties has been won as the holder of custody, then the party who must voluntarily hand over his custody rights to the winning party voluntarily. This is a lot in practice, often parties who do not want to give up custody of their children to the winning party.</em> <em>The results of this study indicate that the execution of child custody has two kinds of obstacles. The first obstacle is the "psychological obstacle of the child", because the child is not an object that can be executed and the second obstacle is a matter of cost, if the child is on the losing side but the losing party does not want to give up custody of the child to the winning party, who will will pay a fee if requesting the services of the police to force the child, because there is no state budget for the execution of child custody.</em></p> <p><em>&nbsp;</em><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>: Divorce, religious courts, execution of children.</em></p> 2022-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERDAGANGAN PRODUK BARANG ILEGAL BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN 2022-10-15T04:58:45+00:00 Winda Yunita Riza Yudha Patria <p><em>A</em><em>r</em><em>tic</em><em>l</em><em>e 62 of the Criminal Code states that trading in illegal goods is a crime, and this is enforced in conjunction with other laws that protect consumers. How is law enforcement against trade in illegal goods products based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. What are the disincentives for law enforcement efforts against the crime of counterfeiting illegal products? This study uses a legal-regulatory approach. Based on the results of the study and discussion, it shows that law enforcement in relation to trade in illegal commercial products based on Law Number 8 of 1999 "Consumer Protection" is carried out through the application of criminal law (criminal law enforcement) and peer review by the National Police and the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency ( BPOM). The perpetrators of trafficking in illegal goods are handled legally at the judicial level based on legal provisions and one of its enforcement is carried out by a decision with a permanent res judicata (inkracht van gewijsde) in order to obtain criminal sanctions and guarantees of legal certainty. others:</em> <em>T</em><em>he criminal sanctions of Article 62(1) in conjunction with Article 8 and Article 9(2) of the</em> <em>Consumer Protection Law Number 8 of 1999 do not have a deterrent effect.</em></p> <p><em>&nbsp;</em><strong><em>Keywords: Trade, Illegal Goods Products, Consumer Protection</em></strong><em>.</em></p> 2022-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022 ANALISIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA GRATIFIKASI (Studi Putusan Nomor 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2017/PN.Tjk) 2022-10-15T05:01:17+00:00 Erniyati Erniyati D. Novrian Syahputra Riko Herdiansah <p><em>Social phenomenon is still going on cases of criminal gratification that need to be optimized law enforcement in the field of the field. One of them is gratification crime of making land sale and purchase documents in Case Number: 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk</em>. <em>The results of the study and discussion show that the factors causing the perpetrators of gratification crime on Decision Case Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk include: intrinsic and extrinsic factors, lack of supervision of the use of funds, the gap to mark up all costs projects, lack of accountability and transparency of budget usage, lack of community control, nepotism-influenced governance structures. Criminal liability of perpetrators of gratification crime based on Case Decision Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk implemented by punishment against Defendant. The judges shall impose a 1 (one) year imprisonment and a fine of Rp 50,000,000.00 (five million rupiahs) on the condition that the unpaid penalty may be replaced by a one-month imprisonment. Legal status of evidence against gratification crime pursuant to Decision Case Number 18 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2017 / PN.Tjk that is in accordance with the court decision that the evidence in the form of document of evidence proof letter remain attached in file case, to the Defendant while goods butki Cash Rp. 25.000.000, - shall be returned to the eligible as stated in Court Decision</em><em>.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Criminal Responsibility, Crime, Gratification</em></p> 2022-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2022