PERFORMA KUALITATIF DAN KUANTITATIF AYAM KAMPUNG (Gallus Gallus Domesticus) DI PETERNAKAN PEMBIBITAN THE MOTHER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37090/jwputb.v7i1.829Abstract
This study aims to identify the quantitative and qualitative performance of native chickens in The Mother breeding farm. This study used 50 male native chickens and 50 female native chickens aged 7 months. Variables observed included body hair pattern color, comb shape, comb color, shank color, eye color, beak color, body weight, chest circumference, shank length, shank circumference, body length, pubic bone length to chest, pubic bone distance and length wing span. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that the body color of the male is Columbian (100%), while the female is solid black (62%), columbian (22%) and speckled or dotted (16%). The male cockscomb is pea (86%) and single (14%), while the female is pea (70%), walnut (20%) and single (10%). The color of the male comb is red (100%), while the female is red (98%) and black (2%). The shank color of males is yellow (74%), black (14%) and white (12%), females are black (74%), white (16%) and yellow (10%). Male eye color is orange (76%) and yellow (24%), while females are orange (66%), yellow (20%) and brown (14%). The color of the male's beak is yellow (54%), black and yellow (38%) and white (8%), while the female's beak is black and yellow (82%), yellow (10%) and white (8%). The results of the quantitative characteristics of the study showed that the male body weight was 2.22 ± 2.02 kg and the female was 1.71 ± 0.25 kg, the male chest circumference was 33.9 ± 3.68 cm and the female was 30.67 ± 2.08 cm, the length male shank 9.61 ± 0.89 cm and female 27 ± 0.59 cm, male shank circumference 5.52 ± 0.65 cm and female 4.4 ± 0.5 cm, male body length 20.27 ± 1.17 cm and female 20.40 ± 2.27 cm, the length of the pubic bone to the chest of the female is 7.87 ± 1.06 cm, the distance between the pubic bones is 2.8 ± 0.49 cm, the length of the male wing span is 23.28 ±2.18 cm and females 16.61±2.44 cm. The conclusion of this study is that the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of free-range chickens on The Mother farm are diverse and selection can be made.
Keywords: Domestication chicken, Selection, Quality breeds, Lampung Province
References
Amlia. M.A Pagala. dan R. Aka. 2016. Studi Karakteristik Sifat Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Ayam Kampung di Kecamatan Lasalimu Kabupaten Buton. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis. Vol 1: 37
Budipurwanto. T. 2001. Studi Tentang Fenotif Ayam Buras Berdasarkan Sifat Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Tesis. Program Studi Magister Ilmu Ternak. Program Pascasarjana. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Crawford, R. D. 1990. Poultry genetic resources: evolution, diversity, and conservation. in: poultry breeding and genetics. R. D. Crawford (Ed). Elsevier Science Publishers. Amsterdam.
Dwiyanto. 2007. Keanekaragaman Sumber Daya Hayati Ayam Lokal Indonesia. LIPI Press. Jakarta.
Ensminger, M. E. 1992. Poultry Science (Animal agriculture series). Interstate Publisher. Inc. Danville, Illinois.
Frandson, R.D. 1992. Anatomi dan fisiologi ternak. Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Harjosuwono, B. A., Arnata, I. W. dan Puspawati, G. A. K. D. 2011. Rancanga Percobaan Teori, Aplikasi SPSS dan Excel. Lintas Kata Publishing. Malang.
Harvey, S, C.G. Scanes., and W.H. Daughaday. 1995. Growth Hormone. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Henuk, Y.L., J.F. Bale- Therik, G. A. M. K. Dewi, dan B. A. Ayanwale. 2015. Why free range eggs are more preferred by consumer than other eggs?. An Invited paper presented in the 1st internasional conference on native chicken february 23-25, 2015, Centara Hotel, Khon Kean, Thailand. Khon Kaen Agr. J. Suppl. 2 : 249 -253.
Imran. M. 2011. Hubungan Jarak Tulang Pubis Terhadap Produksi Telur Itik Lokal. Kreasi Bajang Belvan. http://kreasibajangbelvan.blogspot.com/2010/10/hubungan-jarak-tulang-pubis-terhadap.html. Diakses pada 15 Agustus 2022. Pukul 23.30 WIB
Lestari, G P, W Hermana, DM Suci. 2020. The Use of Eichhornia crassipes, Indigofera sp and Ipomea sp. as Forage in Turkey Rations on Performance and Meat Cholesterol. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan. Departemen Ilmu Nutrisi dan Teknologi Pakan, Fakultas Peternakan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Lucas A. M., Stettenhaim PR. 1972. Avian anatomy: integument. Part I.15, Part II, 58-565. Washington (US): U.S Department Of Agriculture.
Mansjoer, S.S. 1985. Pengkajian sifat-sifat produksi ayam kampung beserta persilangannya dengan rhode island red. Disertasi. Fakultas Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Milas, Ezri S. S, Josephine L. P. Saerang, Lucia J. Lambey, Ben J. Takaendengan. 2020. Karakteristik Fenotipe Beberapa Sifat Kuantitatif Ayam Kampung di Minahasa. Zootec Vol. 40 No. 2: 603--614. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado.
Mu’in, M. A. 2008. Heritabilitas Beberapa Ukuran Tubuh Ayam Kampung. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan 3(1): 16-19.
Mufarid, H. 1996. Beternak ayam hutan. Penebar Swadaya. Cetakan ke-X. Jakarta.
Mufti, R. 2003. Studi ukuran dan bentuk tubuh ayam kampung, ayam pelung dan persilangannya. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Muttaqin, R.K, Heni S.P dan Ani V M. Nurgiartiningsih. 2016. The Relationship Between The Length of Pubis Bone and Breast Bone Toward Egg Weight, Egg Index, and Egg Production of Lohmann Brown Strain. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Nishida, T., K. Nozawa, K. Kondo, S.S. Mansjoer and H. Martojo. 1980. Morphological and genetical studies in the Indonesian native fowl. The Origin and Phylogeny of Indonesian Native Livestock. Vol 1. pp. 47-70.
Nishida. T. K. Nozawa. Y. Hayasi. T. Hashiguchi and S.S. Mansjoer.1982. Body Measurement and Analis on Exsternal Genetic Characters of Indonesian Native Fowl. The Ori.and Phy. of Indonesian Native Livestock. III: 73-83.
Noor, R. R. 2010. Genetika ternak. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Nova, K dan Sulastri. 2016. Penuntun Praktikum Ilmu Tilik Ternak. Universitas Lampung. Lampung.
Nozawa, K. 1980. Phylogenetic studies on native domestic animal in East and Southeast Asia. Tropical Agriculture Reseach Center, Japan IV: 23-43.
Nuroso. 2010. Ayam kampung pedaging hari per hari. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Permadi. A. N. N. E. Kurnianto dan Sutiyono. 2020. Karakteristik morfometrik ayam kampung jantan dan betina di Desa Tirtomulyo Kecamatan Plantungan. Kabupaten Kendal. Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia 22 (1): 11-20.
Rajab dan Papilaya, B.J. 2012.Sifat kuantitatif ayam kampung lokal pada pemeliharaan tradisional. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Tanaman. 2 (2) : 61-64.
Rangkuti, N.A., Hamdan, dan A.H. Daulay. 2014. Identifikasi morfometriks dan jarak genetik ayam kampung di Labuhan Batu Selatan. Jurnal Peternakan Intergratif 3 (1): 96-119.
Sartika, T., D. K. Wati, H. S. Iman Rahayu dan S. Iskandar. 2008. Perbandingan genetic eksternal ayam wareng dan ayam kampung yang dilihat dari laju introgresi dan variabilitas genetiknya Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 13(4):279-287.
Sinpru, P., R. Bunnom, C. Poompramun, P. Kaewsatuan, S. Sornsan, S. Kubota, W. Molee dan A. Molee. 2021. Association of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I genotype with body weight, dominance of body weight, and mRNA expression in Korat slow-growing chickens. Animal Bioscience Journal. (34)12: 1886–1894.
Smyth, J.R. 1990. Genetics of plumage, skin and eye pigmentation in chickens. In: Crawford (Ed). Poultry breeding and genetics. Elsevier. Developments in animal and veterinary sciences, 22. Pp. 169-208.
Subekti K dan F. Arlina. 2011. Karakteristik genetik eksternal ayam kampung di Kecamatan Sungai Pagu Kabupaten Solok Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan,14(2):74-86.
Suharyanto, A. A. 2007. Panen ayam kampung dalam 7 minggu bebas flu burung. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Sulandari S, Zein MSA, Paryanti S, Sartika T, Astuti M, Widjistuti T, Sujana E, Darana S, Setiawan I, Garnida D. 2007. Sumber daya genetik ayam lokal Indonesia. dalam: keragaman sumber daya hayati ayam lokal Indonesia, potensi dan pemanfaatannya. LPI Press. Jakarta.
Sunari, Rukmiasih dan Peni, S. Hardjosworo. 2001. Perkembangan Teknologi Peternakan Unggas Air di Indonesia Lokakarya Unggas Air. Balai Peternakan Ciawi, Bogor.
Suprijatna, E., U. Atmomarsono dan R. Kartosudjana. 2008. Ilmu dasar ternak unggas. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Tarigan, R, T. 2010. Karakteristik Sifat Kualitatif dan Sifat Kuantitatif Ayam Walik di Sumedang dan Bogor. Skripsi. Departemen Ilmu Produksi Dan Teknologi Peternakan. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Warwick. E.J. J.M. Astuti dan W. Hardjosubroto. 1990. Pemuliaan Ternak. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
Wiranata, G. A., I. G. A. M. K. Dewi dan R. R. Indrawati. 2013. Pengaruh energy metabolis dan protein ransum terhadap presentase karkas dan organ dalam ayam kampung (Galus domesticus) betina umur 30 minggu. Peternakan tropika. 1 (2) : 87-100.
Yatim, W. 1991. Genetika, Edisi IV. Tarsito, Bandung
Yuwanta, T. 2004. Dasar ternak Unggas. Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta.
Zainatha F M. 2012. Identifikasi Keragaman Gen Growth Hormone Receptor Exon 8 (GHR|SSpI) pada Sapi Friesian Holstein dengan Metode Pcr-Rflp. Skripsi. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Riyanti Riyanti, Khaira Nova, Teguh Rafian, Sulastri Sulastri, Adityo Suhadi, Mentari Mentari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
